All course stories
Dr. Lisa Troy
MKTG 409 · Mays Business School, Texas A&M

How MKTG 409 made AI use assessable, not invisible

800+
students per semester
TedoGPT
integrated AI practice
Chat Defense
live reasoning assessment
92%
Average completion rate
AI-ready
not AI-proof
Background

Scale was solved. Then AI changed the assessment problem.

MKTG 409 had already used Cartedo to scale hands-on marketing practice across an 800+ student course. Students were completing simulations, receiving personalized feedback, and reaching career-readiness benchmarks through repeated practice.

Then AI changed the assessment problem. By Spring 2025, large language models were part of how students worked. Written submissions became more polished. Scores rose. But student thinking became harder to see.

Dr. Troy did not want to ban AI. That would not prepare students for the workplace. MKTG 409 needed a way to let students use AI while still assessing whether they could apply marketing knowledge, critique AI output, and defend the final decision.

AI use became normal Written work looked polished Scores rose Thinking was harder to see Students still had to defend decisions
THE CHALLENGE

Written answers were no longer enough

A polished response could look strong on the surface, but it did not always prove the student understood the work. For Dr. Troy, the assessment question changed.

Hard to assess
Did the student understand the marketing concept?
Did they critique the AI output?
Did they accept AI suggestions blindly?
Did they revise based on the course context?
Could they explain the final recommendation?
Could they defend the decision under pressure?
The question changed from
Did students use AI?
to
Can students use AI and still think for themselves?
What Cartedo made visible

AI use became part of the evidence, not a hidden variable

Traditional written work showed
Cartedo made visible
The shift

Students could use AI — but they had to walk the talk

With TedoGPT, students used an integrated AI assistant inside the simulation to brainstorm, compare options, draft recommendations, and refine their thinking.

But Cartedo did not stop at the written answer.

Students then entered Chat Defense, where a simulated stakeholder asked personalized follow-up questions based on their own submission. The stakeholder could challenge assumptions, ask for evidence, introduce a curveball, or dig into weak reasoning.

The assignment changed from polished submission to live reasoning.

The AI assessment flow
1
Co-create with TedoGPT

Students use AI to explore options and draft ideas.

2
Critique the output

Students decide what to accept, reject, or revise.

3
Submit the recommendation

Students produce a written response grounded in the scenario.

4
Receive manager feedback

Cartedo gives targeted feedback aligned to the task.

5
Defend live

A stakeholder asks personalized follow-up questions.

6
Review the rationale

Cartedo shows the reasoning behind the grade.

The outcome

Cartedo made student thinking visible again

MKTG 409 didn't have to ban AI. Students could use it — but they still had to apply marketing knowledge, critique outputs, make decisions, respond to feedback, and defend recommendations under challenge.

AI-ready, not AI-proof.
Student responses

Based on student reflections and Dr. Troy's independent Qualtrics Survey, April 2025.

"AI helped me start, but the defense made me realize I still had to understand what I was saying."

"I couldn't just paste a perfect answer. The follow-up questions made me explain why I picked that strategy."

"The chat felt like a manager pushing back on my recommendation."

"It made using AI feel more like work — not cheating, but something I had to check and defend."

THE TAKEAWAY

The AI question changed

From
Did students use AI?
To
Can students use AI thoughtfully, apply course knowledge, and defend the final work?

For MKTG 409, that shift made AI part of the learning experience instead of only a cheating concern. Students could use tools — but they still had to think.

Disclaimer: Independent course-use example

This Cartedo-authored story is a factual example of course use—not a testimonial or endorsement. The featured instructor and institution did not write, review, approve, or sponsor it, and no affiliation or recommendation should be inferred.

See what Cartedo can do in your course

Preview one simulation with your topic or assignment. Let students use AI, then assess whether they can apply, explain, and defend the work.

Students only pay when you assign Cartedo in your course.