Background
Scale was solved. Then AI changed the assessment problem.
MKTG 409 had already used Cartedo to scale hands-on marketing practice across an 800+ student course. Students were completing simulations, receiving personalized feedback, and reaching career-readiness benchmarks through repeated practice.
Then AI changed the assessment problem. By Spring 2025, large language models were part of how students worked. Written submissions became more polished. Scores rose. But student thinking became harder to see.
Dr. Troy did not want to ban AI. That would not prepare students for the workplace. MKTG 409 needed a way to let students use AI while still assessing whether they could apply marketing knowledge, critique AI output, and defend the final decision.
AI use became normal
Written work looked polished
Scores rose
Thinking was harder to see
Students still had to defend decisions
The shift
Students could use AI — but they had to walk the talk
With TedoGPT, students used an integrated AI assistant inside the simulation to brainstorm, compare options, draft recommendations, and refine their thinking.
But Cartedo did not stop at the written answer.
Students then entered Chat Defense, where a simulated stakeholder asked personalized follow-up questions based on their own submission. The stakeholder could challenge assumptions, ask for evidence, introduce a curveball, or dig into weak reasoning.
The assignment changed from polished submission to live reasoning.
The AI assessment flow
1
Co-create with TedoGPT
Students use AI to explore options and draft ideas.
2
Critique the output
Students decide what to accept, reject, or revise.
3
Submit the recommendation
Students produce a written response grounded in the scenario.
4
Receive manager feedback
Cartedo gives targeted feedback aligned to the task.
5
Defend live
A stakeholder asks personalized follow-up questions.
6
Review the rationale
Cartedo shows the reasoning behind the grade.